Inteligencia artificial en la toma de decisiones clínicas: revisión sistemática con síntesis narrativa de la literatura publicada entre 2019 y 2026

Autores/as

  • Md. Noemi Monserrath Matza-Aldaz Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo image/svg+xml Autor/a
  • Md. Washington Jordano Zambrano-Baque Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo image/svg+xml Autor/a

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65133/irj.v2.n1.2026/a19

Palabras clave:

inteligencia artificial, toma de decisiones clínicas, sistemas de apoyo a la decisión clínica, modelos de lenguaje de gran tamaño, revisión sistemática, seguridad del paciente

Resumen

Introducción: la inteligencia artificial (IA) se incorpora con rapidez al apoyo de las decisiones clínicas, pero la evidencia sobre su utilidad y sus riesgos está dispersa. Objetivo: analizar la influencia de la IA en la toma de decisiones clínicas entre 2019 a marzo de 2026: su utilidad, sus desafíos y oportunidades y su aporte a la atención del paciente. Metodología: revisión sistemática con síntesis narrativa en dos fases, según PRISMA 2020. La primera fase (2019 a 2023) buscó en Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed y Springer Link, y la actualización (2024 a marzo de 2026) en el Directorio de Revistas de Acceso Abierto. La calidad se valoró con diez criterios (corte en 7,5 de 10). Resultados: se incluyeron 63 registros (62 estudios), 26 de la primera fase y 37 de la actualización. Frente a una primera fase descriptiva, la actualización aportó estudios primarios, entre ellos cinco ensayos aleatorizados y ocho con modelos de lenguaje. La IA mejoró la detección de cáncer, la auscultación y la rapidez de algunas decisiones, pero no siempre el razonamiento diagnóstico, y se documentaron dependencia inadecuada, falsos positivos y pérdida de habilidades. Los profesionales piden validación, transparencia, integración en la historia clínica y claridad sobre la responsabilidad. No hubo estudios latinoamericanos. Conclusiones: la IA es un apoyo útil cuando se valida en su contexto y se usa bajo supervisión médica, y su beneficio depende de cómo se integra en el trabajo clínico. Hacen falta ensayos con desenlaces en pacientes y estudios en Latinoamérica.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Almotairi, K. H., Hussein, A. M. A., Abualigah, L., Abujayyab, S. K. M., Mahmoud, E. H., Ghanem, B. O., y Gandomi, A. H. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of image processing, tracking of disease, prediction of outcomes, and computational medicine. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010011

Alruwaili, A. N., Alshammari, A. M., Alhaiti, A., Elsharkawy, N. B., Ali, S. I., y Ramadan, O. M. E. (2025). Neonatal nurses' experiences with generative AI in clinical decision-making: A qualitative exploration in high-risk NICUs. BMC Nursing, 24, 386. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03044-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03044-6

Ambags, E. L., Capitoli, G., L'Imperio, V., Provenzano, M., Nobile, M. S., y Liò, P. (2023). Assisting clinical practice with fuzzy probabilistic decision trees [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.07788

Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador. (2021). Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales. Registro Oficial, Quinto Suplemento 459, 26 de mayo de 2021.

Bajgain, B., Lorenzetti, D., Lee, J., y Sauro, K. (2023). Determinants of implementing artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support tools in healthcare: A scoping review protocol. BMJ Open, 13(2), e068373. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068373

Benzinger, L., Ursin, F., Balke, W. T., Kacprowski, T., y Salloch, S. (2023). Should artificial intelligence be used to support clinical ethical decision-making? A systematic review of reasons. BMC Medical Ethics, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00929-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00929-6

Bixby, C. J., y Miller, B. (2025). Real-world use of an artificial intelligence-powered clinical decision support tool for ovarian stimulation. F&S Reports, 6(2), 140-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2025.01.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2025.01.015

Blagojević, A., y Geroski, T. (2023). A review of the application of artificial intelligence in medicine: From data to personalised models. En N. Filipović (Ed.), Applied artificial intelligence: Medicine, biology, chemistry, financial, games, engineering (pp. 271-305). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29717-5_17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29717-5_17

Briganti, G. (2023). Artificial intelligence in psychiatry. Psychiatria Danubina, 35(Supl. 2), 15-19.

Brown, C., Nazeer, R., Gibbs, A., Le Page, P., y Mitchell, A. R. (2023). Breaking bias: The role of artificial intelligence in improving clinical decision-making. Cureus, 15(3), e36415. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36415

Budzyń, K., Romańczyk, M., Kitala, D., Kołodziej, P., Bugajski, M., Adami, H. O., Blom, J., Buszkiewicz, M., Halvorsen, N., Hassan, C., Romańczyk, T., Holme, Ø., Jarus, K., Fielding, S., Kunar, M., Pellise, M., Pilonis, N., Kamiński, M. F., Kalager, M., ... Mori, Y. (2025). Endoscopist deskilling risk after exposure to artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: A multicentre, observational study. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 10(10), 896-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00133-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00133-5

Castillo-Parra, B., Hidalgo-Cajo, B. G., Vásconez-Barrera, M., y Oleas-López, J. (2022). Gamification in higher education: A review of the literature. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(3), 797-816. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i3.7341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i3.7341

Chang, H., Yu, J. Y., Park, H., Song, Y. J., Heo, S., Park, J. E., Lee, G. T., Lee, S. U., Kim, T., Yoon, H., Hwang, S. Y., y Cha, W. C. (2025). From prediction to action: A retrospective observational study on the real-world implementation of Critical Interventions (CrIs), an AI-based clinical decision support system changing clinical behavior in the emergency department. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 25, 405. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03234-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03234-x

Choi, S. Y., Kim, J. H., Chung, H. S., Lim, S., Kim, E. H., y Choi, A. (2024). Impact of a deep learning-based brain CT interpretation algorithm on clinical decision-making for intracranial hemorrhage in the emergency department. Scientific Reports, 14, 22292. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73589-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73589-0

Collins, G. S., Moons, K. G. M., Dhiman, P., Riley, R. D., Beam, A. L., Van Calster, B., Ghassemi, M., Liu, X., Reitsma, J. B., van Smeden, M., Boulesteix, A.-L., Camaradou, J. C., Celi, L. A., Denaxas, S., Denniston, A. K., Glocker, B., Golub, R. M., Harvey, H., Heinze, G., ... Logullo, P. (2024). TRIPOD+AI statement: Updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ, 385, e078378. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078378 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078378

Cooper, J., Haroon, S., Crowe, F., Nirantharakumar, K., Jackson, T., Fitzsimmons, L., Hathaway, E., Flanagan, S., Marshall, T., Jackson, L. J., Gunathilaka, N., D'Elia, A., Morris, S. G., y Greenfield, S. (2025). Perspectives of health care professionals on the use of AI to support clinical decision-making in the management of multiple long-term conditions: Interview study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e71980. https://doi.org/10.2196/71980 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/71980

Correia, E. A. S., y Valério Netto, A. (2025). Suporte à decisão clínica baseado em IA: Revisão de escopo. Journal of Health Informatics, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.59681/2175-4411.v17.2025.1457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59681/2175-4411.v17.2025.1457

Damato, V., Campiglia, P., y Bassano, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence algorithms in precision medicine: A new approach in clinical decision-making. En The human side of service engineering (AHFE International Conference). AHFE Open Access. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002561 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002561

d'Elia, A., Morris, S. G., Cooper, J., Nirantharakumar, K., Jackson, T., Marshall, T., Fitzsimmons, L., Jackson, L. J., Crowe, F., Haroon, S., Greenfield, S., y Hathaway, E. (2025). Perceptions of an AI-based clinical decision support tool for prescribing in multiple long-term conditions: A qualitative study of general practice clinicians in England. BMJ Open, 15(11), e102833. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102833 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102833

Dlugatch, R., Georgieva, A., y Kerasidou, A. (2024). AI-driven decision support systems and epistemic reliance: A qualitative study on obstetricians’ and midwives’ perspectives on integrating AI-driven CTG into clinical decision making. BMC Medical Ethics, 25, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00990-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00990-1

Dratsch, T., Chen, X., Rezazade Mehrizi, M., Kloeckner, R., Mähringer-Kunz, A., Püsken, M., Baeßler, B., Sauer, S., Maintz, D., y Pinto dos Santos, D. (2023). Automation bias in mammography: The impact of artificial intelligence BI-RADS suggestions on reader performance. Radiology, 307(4), e222176. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.222176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.222176

Düvel, J. A., Lampe, D., Kirchner, M., Elkenkamp, S., Cimiano, P., Düsing, C., Marchi, H., Schmiegel, S., Fuchs, C., Claßen, S., Meier, K.-L., Borgstedt, R., Rehberg, S., y Greiner, W. (2025). An AI-based clinical decision support system for antibiotic therapy in sepsis (KINBIOTICS): Use case analysis. JMIR Human Factors, 12, e66699. https://doi.org/10.2196/66699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/66699

Elgin, C. Y., y Elgin, C. (2024). Ethical implications of AI-driven clinical decision support systems on healthcare resource allocation: A qualitative study of healthcare professionals’ perspectives. BMC Medical Ethics, 25, 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01151-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01151-8

Farias, M. A., Badino, M., Marti, M., Báscolo, E., García Saisó, S., y D'Agostino, M. (2023). La transformación digital como estrategia para el fortalecimiento de las funciones esenciales de salud pública en las Américas. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 47, e150. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2023.150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2023.150

Franc, J. M., Verde, M., Bonney, J., Hung, K. K. C., Cuthbertson, J., Raffee, L., Serra, E., y Caviglia, M. (2025). Applications of artificial intelligence-guided clinical decision support in disaster medicine: An international delphi study. Frontiers in Disaster and Emergency Medicine, 3, 1698372. https://doi.org/10.3389/femer.2025.1698372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/femer.2025.1698372

Ghozali, M. T., Satibi, y Fortwengel, G. (2025). Adoption intentions toward AI-based clinical decision support tools: A TAM study on hospital pharmacists. Journal of Information and Communication Technology (Journal of ICT), 24(3), 44-69. https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2025.24.3.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2025.24.3.3

Goh, E., Bunning, B., Khoong, E. C., Gallo, R. J., Milstein, A., Centola, D., y Chen, J. H. (2025). Physician clinical decision modification and bias assessment in a randomized controlled trial of AI assistance. Communications Medicine, 5(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00781-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00781-2

Goh, E., Gallo, R., Hom, J., Strong, E., Weng, Y., Kerman, H., Cool, J. A., Kanjee, Z., Parsons, A. S., Ahuja, N., Horvitz, E., Yang, D., Milstein, A., Olson, A. P. J., Rodman, A., y Chen, J. H. (2024). Large language model influence on diagnostic reasoning: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 7(10), e2440969. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40969 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40969

Gomez-Cabello, C. A., Borna, S., Pressman, S., Haider, S. A., Haider, C. R., y Forte, A. J. (2024). Artificial-intelligence-based clinical decision support systems in primary care: A scoping review of current clinical implementations. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(3), 685-698. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14030045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14030045

Gönüldaş, F., Bulut, E. A., Özbey, Ö. N., y Öztürk, C. (2025). Clinical decision-making in implant planning: A comparison between human and artificial intelligence. Applied Sciences, 15(19), 10744. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910744

Gunlicks-Stoessel, M., Liu, Y., Parkhill, C., Morrell, N., Choy-Brown, M., Mehus, C., Hetler, J., y August, G. (2024). Adolescent, parent, and provider attitudes toward a machine learning based clinical decision support system for selecting treatment for youth depression. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 24(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02410-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02410-1

Guo, Y., Huang, C., Sheng, Y., Zhang, W., Ye, X., Lian, H., Xu, J., y Chen, Y. (2024). Improve the efficiency and accuracy of ophthalmologists' clinical decision-making based on AI technology. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 24, 192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02587-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02587-z

Hager, P., Jungmann, F., Holland, R., Bhagat, K., Hubrecht, I., Knauer, M., Vielhauer, J., Makowski, M., Braren, R., Kaissis, G., y Rueckert, D. (2024). Evaluation and mitigation of the limitations of large language models in clinical decision-making. Nature Medicine, 30(9), 2613-2622. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03097-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03097-1

Han, R., Acosta, J. N., Shakeri, Z., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Topol, E. J., y Rajpurkar, P. (2024). Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: A scoping review. The Lancet Digital Health, 6(5), e367-e373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00047-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00047-5

Hernandez, S., Nguyen, C., Parkes, J., Burger, H., Rhee, D. J., Netherton, T., Mumme, R., Vega, J. G. D. L., Duryea, J., Leone, A., Paulino, A. C., Cardenas, C., Howell, R., Fuentes, D., Pollard-Larkin, J., y Court, L. (2023). Automating the treatment planning process for 3D-conformal pediatric craniospinal irradiation therapy. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 70(3), e30164. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.30164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.30164

Hernström, V., Josefsson, V., Sartor, H., Schmidt, D., Larsson, A.-M., Hofvind, S., Andersson, I., Rosso, A., Hagberg, O., y Lång, K. (2025). Screening performance and characteristics of breast cancer detected in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): A randomised, controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study. The Lancet Digital Health, 7(3), e175-e183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00267-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00267-X

Hirosawa, T., Sakamoto, T., Harada, Y., Tokumasu, K., y Shimizu, T. (2024). Clinical decision support system using a machine learning model to assist simultaneous cardiopulmonary auscultation: Open-label randomized controlled trial. Digital Health, 10, 20552076241233689. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241233689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241233689

Huang, Z., Lim, H. Y.-F., Ow, J. T., Sun, S. H.-L., y Chow, A. (2024). Doctors’ perception on the ethical use of AI-enabled clinical decision support systems for antibiotic prescribing recommendations in Singapore. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1420032. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1420032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1420032

Iftimia, N., Pandya, R., y Mahoney, F. (2023). New advances in artificial intelligence for biomedical research and clinical decision-making [Preprint]. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.0243.v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.0243.v1

Juang, W. C., Hsu, M. H., Cai, Z. X., y Chen, C. M. (2022). Developing an AI-assisted clinical decision support system to enhance in-patient holistic health care. PLOS ONE, 17(10), e0276501. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276501

Keller, M., Rohner, M., y Honigmann, P. (2024). The potential benefit of artificial intelligence regarding clinical decision-making in the treatment of wrist trauma patients. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 19, 579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05063-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05063-6

Kitchenham, B., y Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Informe técnico EBSE-2007-01). Keele University y University of Durham.

Kulkarni, P. A., y Singh, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in clinical diagnosis: Opportunities, challenges, and hype. JAMA, 330(4), 317-318. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.11440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.11440

Küper, A., Lodde, G. C., Livingstone, E., Schadendorf, D., y Krämer, N. (2025). Psychological factors influencing appropriate reliance on AI-enabled clinical decision support systems: Experimental web-based study among dermatologists. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e58660. https://doi.org/10.2196/58660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/58660

Lawton, T., Morgan, P., Porter, Z., Hickey, S., Cunningham, A., Hughes, N., Iacovides, I., Jia, Y., Sharma, V., y Habli, I. (2024). Clinicians risk becoming 'liability sinks' for artificial intelligence. Future Healthcare Journal, 11(1), 100007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100007

Ledziński, Ł., y Grześk, G. (2023). Artificial intelligence as an emerging tool for cardiologists. Medical Sciences Forum, 21(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECB2023-14339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ECB2023-14339

Lin, C.-S., Liu, W.-T., Tsai, D.-J., Lou, Y.-S., Chang, C.-H., Lee, C.-C., Fang, W.-H., Wang, C.-C., Chen, Y.-Y., Lin, W.-S., Cheng, C.-C., Lee, C.-C., Wang, C.-H., Tsai, C.-S., Lin, S.-H., y Lin, C. (2024). AI-enabled electrocardiography alert intervention and all-cause mortality: A pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Nature Medicine, 30(5), 1461-1470. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02961-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02961-4

Lin, T.-H., Chung, H.-Y., Jian, M.-J., Chang, C.-K., Perng, C.-L., Chang, F.-Y., Chen, Y.-H., y Shang, H.-S. (2025). Implementing an AI-enhanced clinical decision support system for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A survey-based randomized controlled trial of antibiotic precision and impact on survival. Implementation Science, 20(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-025-01453-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-025-01453-4

Loftus, T. J., Tighe, P. J., Filiberto, A. C., Efron, P. A., Brakenridge, S. C., Mohr, A. M., Rashidi, P., Upchurch, G. R., Jr., y Bihorac, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence and surgical decision-making. JAMA Surgery, 155(2), 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4917

Lorenzini, G., Arbelaez Ossa, L., Shaw, D. M., y Elger, B. S. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the doctor-patient relationship expanding the paradigm of shared decision making. Bioethics, 37(5), 424-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13158

Mahwish, N., Saherawala, B. A., y Jhancy, M. (2022). Clinical decision making in dysmorphology: Emerging role of artificial intelligence. British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, 9(5), 366-374. https://doi.org/10.14738/jbemi.95.13309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14738/jbemi.95.13309

Mehta, V. (2023). Artificial intelligence in medicine: Revolutionizing healthcare for improved patient outcomes. Journal of Medical Research and Innovation, 7(2), e000292. https://doi.org/10.32892/jmri.292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32892/jmri.292

Mingels, S., Piehl, H., Therrien, M., Akhmad, E., van Hienen, A., van Soest, J., Hochstenbach, L., Dekker, A., Damman, O., y Fijten, R. (2026). Understanding clinicians' informational needs for AI-driven clinical decision support systems: Qualitative interview study. JMIR Medical Education, 12, e85228. https://doi.org/10.2196/85228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/85228

Newman-Toker, D. E., Nassery, N., Schaffer, A. C., Yu-Moe, C. W., Clemens, G. D., Wang, Z., Zhu, Y., Saber Tehrani, A. S., Fanai, M., Hassoon, A., y Siegal, D. (2024). Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA. BMJ Quality & Safety, 33(2), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014130

Obong'o, C., Njenga, G., Otiangala, D., Jepleting, E., Wairimu, S., Emmanuel-Fabula, M., Kiptinness, S., Korom, R., Taliesin, B., y Mateen, B. A. (2026). Mixed-methods evaluation of clinician experiences and adoption patterns of an EHR-integrated generative AI-based clinical decision support uptake by clinicians in Kenya. BMJ Digital Health & AI, 2(1), e000207. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdhai-2025-000207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdhai-2025-000207

Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2021). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200

Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2024). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: Guidance on large multi-modal models. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240084759

Organización Panamericana de la Salud. (2021). 8 principios rectores de la transformación digital del sector de la salud: Un llamado a la acción panamericana (OPS/EIH/IS/21-0004).

Organización Panamericana de la Salud. (2025, 18 de noviembre). Inteligencia artificial y fuerza de trabajo en salud: OPS presenta resultados de un estudio regional que orientará políticas en las Américas. https://www.paho.org/es/noticias/18-11-2025-inteligencia-artificial-fuerza-trabajo-salud-ops-presenta-resultados-estudio

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Ramgopal, S., Sanchez-Pinto, L. N., Horvat, C. M., Carroll, M. S., Luo, Y., y Florin, T. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support in pediatrics. Pediatric Research, 93(2), 334-341. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02226-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-022-02226-1

Rathore, F. A., y Rathore, M. A. (2023). The emerging role of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 73(7), 1368-1369. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.23-48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.23-48

Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., y Koffel, J. B. (2021). PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z

Santoro, E. (2023). Intelligenza artificiale in medicina: Siamo pronti? [Artificial intelligence in medicine: Are we ready?]. Recenti Progressi in Medicina, 114(3), 142-144. https://doi.org/10.1701/3981.39636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1701/3981.39636

Schaffernak, I., Cecil, J., Kleine, A.-K., y Lermer, E. (2025). Sociotechnical influences on the adoption and use of AI-enabled clinical decision support systems in ophthalmology: A theory-based interview study. BMC Health Services Research, 25, 1398. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13620-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13620-w

Shulha, M., Hovdebo, J., D'Souza, V., Thibault, F., y Harmouche, R. (2024). Integrating explainable machine learning in clinical decision support systems: Study involving a modified design thinking approach. JMIR Formative Research, 8, e50475. https://doi.org/10.2196/50475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/50475

Siden, R., Kerman, H., Gallo, R. J., Cool, J. A., Hom, J., Goh, E., Ahuja, N., Heidenreich, P., Shieh, L., Yang, D., Chen, J. H., Rodman, A., y Holdsworth, L. M. (2025). A typology of physician input approaches to using AI chatbots for clinical decision-making. npj Digital Medicine, 9, 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02184-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02184-y

Sorokin, D. Yu., Trufanova, E. S., Rebrova, O. Yu., Bezlepkina, O. B., y Laptev, D. N. (2024). Clinical decision support system based on artificial intelligence for adjusting insulin pump parameters in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Mellitus (Сахарный диабет), 27(3), 242-253. https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13167

Takita, H., Kabata, D., Walston, S. L., Tatekawa, H., Saito, K., Tsujimoto, Y., Miki, Y., y Ueda, D. (2025). A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance comparison between generative AI and physicians. npj Digital Medicine, 8, 175. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01543-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01543-z

Tun, H. M., Rahman, H. A., Naing, L., y Malik, O. A. (2025). Trust in artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support systems among health care workers: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e69678. https://doi.org/10.2196/69678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/69678

Uihlein, A., Beissel, L., Ajlani, A. H., Orzechowski, M., Leinert, C., Kocar, T. D., Pankratz, C., Schuetze, K., Gebhard, F., Steger, F., Fotteler, M. L., y Denkinger, M. (2024). Expectations and requirements of surgical staff for an AI-supported clinical decision support system for older patients: Qualitative study. JMIR Aging, 7, e57899. https://doi.org/10.2196/57899 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/57899

Unión Europea. (2024). Reglamento (UE) 2024/1689 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 13 de junio de 2024, por el que se establecen normas armonizadas en materia de inteligencia artificial. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea, L, 2024/1689.

Vasey, B., Nagendran, M., Campbell, B., Clifton, D. A., Collins, G. S., Denaxas, S., Denniston, A. K., Faes, L., Geerts, B., Ibrahim, M., Liu, X., Mateen, B. A., Mathur, P., McCradden, M. D., Morgan, L., Ordish, J., Rogers, C., Saria, S., Ting, D. S. W., ... McCulloch, P. (2022). Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. Nature Medicine, 28(5), 924-933. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01772-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070904

Wang, L., Chen, X., Zhang, L., Li, L., Huang, Y., Sun, Y., y Yuan, X. (2023). Artificial intelligence in clinical decision support systems for oncology. International Journal of Medical Sciences, 20(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.77205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.77205

Wang, X., y Wang, P. (2025). Clinical decision-making for uveal melanoma radiotherapy: Comparative performance of experienced radiation oncologists and leading generative AI models. Frontiers in Oncology, 15, 1605916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1605916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1605916

Wehkamp, K., Krawczak, M., y Schreiber, S. (2023). The quality and utility of artificial intelligence in patient care. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 120(27-28), 463-469. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0124

Whitney, C., Preis, H., y Ramos Vargas, A. (2025). Anticipatory moral distress in machine learning-based clinical decision support tool development: A qualitative analysis. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 7, 100540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100540

Wilhelm, C., Steckelberg, A., y Rebitschek, F. G. (2025). Benefits and harms associated with the use of AI-related algorithmic decision-making systems by healthcare professionals: A systematic review. The Lancet Regional Health: Europe, 48, 101145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101145

Wong, A., Otles, E., Donnelly, J. P., Krumm, A., McCullough, J., DeTroyer-Cooley, O., Pestrue, J., Phillips, M., Konye, J., Penoza, C., Ghous, M., y Singh, K. (2021). External validation of a widely implemented proprietary sepsis prediction model in hospitalized patients. JAMA Internal Medicine, 181(8), 1065-1070. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2626

Wu, M., Du, X., Gu, R., y Wei, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence for clinical decision support in sepsis. Frontiers in Medicine, 8, 665464. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.665464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.665464

Xu, W., Wang, X., Yang, L., Meng, M., Sun, C., Li, W., Li, J., Zheng, L., Tang, T., Jia, W., y Chen, X. (2024). Consistency of CSCO AI with multidisciplinary clinical decision-making teams in breast cancer: A retrospective study. Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy, 16, 413-422. https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S419433 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S419433

Yang, Q., Hao, Y., Quan, K., Yang, S., Zhao, Y., Kuleshov, V., y Wang, F. (2023). Harnessing biomedical literature to calibrate clinicians' trust in AI decision support systems. En Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581393

Yu, Z., Hu, N., Zhao, Q., Hu, X., Jia, C., Zhang, C., Liu, B., y Li, Y. (2025). The willingness of doctors to adopt artificial intelligence-driven clinical decision support systems at different hospitals in China: Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of survey data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e62768. https://doi.org/10.2196/62768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/62768

Zhao, Q., Hu, X., Hu, N., Xu, C., y Yu, Z. (2025). Analysis of clinical doctors’ adoption willingness pathway for the artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support system (AI-CDSS): A survey study from China. Digital Health, 11, 20552076251396984. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251396984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251396984

Zmudzki, F., Smeets, R. J. E. M., Groenewegen, J. S., y van der Graaff, E. (2025). Machine learning clinical decision support for interdisciplinary multimodal chronic musculoskeletal pain treatment: Prospective pilot study of patient assessment and prognostic profile validation. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, 12, e65890. https://doi.org/10.2196/65890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/65890

Descargas

Publicado

2026-04-05

Número

Sección

Artículos de Revisión

Categorías

Cómo citar

Matza-Aldaz, N. M., & Zambrano-Baque, W. J. (2026). Inteligencia artificial en la toma de decisiones clínicas: revisión sistemática con síntesis narrativa de la literatura publicada entre 2019 y 2026. INNOVATE: Research Journal, 2(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.65133/irj.v2.n1.2026/a19

Artículos similares

1-10 de 18

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.